What's this all about?
Threshold & Union House 65 Shepherd's Bush Green |
The image at the top shows the Dorsett Hotel on the left, and the proposed Hoxton Hotel on the right.
On the right you can see the unlovely 1960s buildings which were (and, in theory, still are) to be demolished.
Was the local community supportive?
Generally, yes. The developers consulted widely and the Hammersmith Society, guardians of good architecture in our neighbourhood, was broadly supportive of the scheme, saying that "redevelopment is appropriate for the site", since the existing building "makes no positive contribution to the west side of Shepherds Bush Green". In other words, they are ugly.
Why was the planning permission defeated?
The case of Paul -v- Ormondroyd was heard in the planning court at the Royal Courts of Justice, before Ms Justine Thornton QC, sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge. The judgment in the case is rather complex and has to do with a "45 degree set back angle general standard", and a "Daylight and Sunlight Assessment", which were apparently breached by the developer's plans.
As always, planning law is very complex, and even developers armed with expensive consultants and lawyers are often defeated in the courts. For example Orion, the developers of Shepherd's Bush Market, spent many years and millions of pounds trying to redevelop the market, all in vain. Pity anyone, even wealthy developers, trying to make sense of the British planning system.
Who is applying for planning permission now?
The applicant is called "Newco 8915 Ltd", which is presumably a holding company of some kind, with the actual developers standing behind it. The new plans are, once again, for a Hoxton hotel.
If you would like to comment on the plans, you can do so here. There are 160 pages of documents to download, so better make a cup of tea first.
The Shepherd's Bush Blog offers a personal view on life in Shepherd's Bush. If you would like to contribute a story, email us at shepherdsbushblog(at)gmail.com. And don't forget to add your opinion in the comments section below.
To say that Threshold & Union Houses are "ugly" is also an understatement! I would hope that the planning issues can be addressed and the new scheme approved. The Hoxton Hotel group are also known for their social responsibility and community interaction.
ReplyDeleteOur planning system is very complex and tough to navigate. It sometimes seems like a minor miracle that anything gets built at all.
DeleteNew Hotel?? Next to the big Dorset hotel and over the road from the Ibis. With all the small boutique hotels scattered in between. I'm so glad the resident centric council think we need another hotel here and not homes and services for our kids that have grown up here.
ReplyDeleteHi Unknown, it's not a case of what the council wants, it's about what the owners of the site want. It is their property, so they should surely be free to build a hotel, if that is the best use of the location.
DeleteOf course. If you have yge money you can build anything.. but Surely the council and planning department have a responsibility towards the nature and facilities available to be built as well that better serve the community. Or is there a true lack of hotels in bush? And an abundance of affordable housing get?
ReplyDeleteActually, it's not always about money. The council successfully killed the redevelopment of Shepherd's Bush Market after the Developers, Orion, spent millions, and many years, on their plans - to no avail. As to affordable housing, this is a matter for the Council and the Government. Why should the owners of Hoxton Hotels be held to account for problems over which they have no control and for which they are not responsible, any more than you or I should?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete